Biorxiv Logo | Peak Proteins

Recently Published Paper from Our COVID-19 Collaboration with MDC and Retrogenix

Following our collaboration last year with the Medicines Discovery Catapult and Retrogenix to advance understanding of the cellular mechanisms of infection by COVID-19, we have a recently published paper.

  • We fulfilled the aims of the project to demonstrate a methodology which can be used for rapid, unbiassed identification of cell surface receptors for SARS-CoV-2, which can be used to support drug screening and drug repurposing approaches for this and future pandemics.
  • We identified interactions with a number of novel SARS-CoV-2 S binding proteins. Three of these receptors, NID1, CNTN1 and APOA4 were specific to SARS-CoV-2, and not SARS-COV, with APOA4 binding the S-protein with equal affinity as ACE2
  • With this knowledge we may further understand the disease pathogenesis of COVID-19 patients and how infection by SARS-CoV-2 may lead to differences in pathology in specific organs or indeed the virulence observed in different ethnicities
  • We have made the findings available via bioRXiv

SARS-CoV-2 comprehensive receptor profiling: mechanistic insight to drive new therapeutic strategies

Sarah MV BrockbankJo SodenRaquel Faba-RodriguezLyn Rosenbrier Ribeiro, Catherine Geh, Helen Thomas, Jenni Delight, Lucy Coverly, W Mark Abbott, Jim Freeth.

Abstract:

Here we describe a hypothesis free approach to screen for interactions of SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein with human cell surface receptors. We used a library screening approach to detect binding interactions across one of the largest known panels of membrane-bound and soluble receptors, comprising 5845 targets, expressed recombinantly in human cells. We were able confirm and replicate SARS-CoV-2 binding to ACE2 and other putative coreceptors such as CD209 and CLEC4M. More significantly, we identified interactions with a number of novel SARS-CoV-2 S binding proteins. Three of these novel receptors, NID1, CNTN1 and APOA4 were specific to SARS-CoV-2, and not SARS-COV, with APOA4 binding the S-protein with equal affinity as ACE2. With this knowledge we may further understand the disease pathogenesis of COVID-19 patients and how infection by SARS-CoV-2 may lead to differences in pathology in specific organs or indeed the virulence observed in different ethnicities. Importantly we illustrate a methodology which can be used for rapid, unbiassed identification of cell surface receptors, to support drug screening and drug repurposing approaches for this and future pandemics.

Before formal publication in a scholarly journal, scientific and medical articles are traditionally “peer reviewed.” In this process, the journal’s editors take advice from various experts—called “referees”—who have assessed the paper and may identify weaknesses in its assumptions, methods, and conclusions. Typically a journal will only publish an article once the editors are satisfied that the authors have addressed referees’ concerns.  Because this process can be lengthy, authors use the bioRxiv service to make their manuscripts available as “preprints” before completing peer review and consequent certification by a journal. This allows other scientists to see, discuss, and comment on the findings immediately. Readers should therefore be aware that articles on bioRxiv have not been finalized by authors, might contain errors, and report information that has not yet been accepted or endorsed in any way by the scientific or medical community.
Go to Top