Lab Plastic Waste

Green Team Blog Instalment 1 – Lab Plastic Waste

Heather Hayes, one of our Green Team here at Peak Proteins gives an update on our efforts to reduce the amount of single use plastic we use.

Did you know that an estimated 5.5 million tonnes of plastic waste are produced annually by scientific research? 1 That’s the equivalent weight of approximately 30,000 blue whales!* Many of us are becoming more and more conscious of our plastic consumption in our personal lives but overlook the environmental impact of our work. As scientists we should be solving the plastic problem, not contributing to it.

*More blue whales than are left in the world today…😢

Lab Plastic Waste

What’s the problem with plastic?

Single-use plastic products are considered to be convenient, inexpensive, inert, and safe. These properties make plastic consumables ideal for use in the lab as tubes, gloves, and pipette tips, among many, many others. It is reasonable to say that plastic has facilitated some of the most important scientific advances of the last few decades. Nevertheless, these plastic products come with a large environmental price tag. Plastic is a resource intensive material to produce. Every stage in plastic’s lifecycle, from extraction of raw materials to disposal of end products, relies on fossil resources resulting in enormous greenhouse gas emissions. Accumulation of plastic in the environment is also causing damage to ecosystems both on land and in the ocean.

Why not recycle?

Much of the plastic waste produced by laboratories is considered hazardous as it has come into contact with chemical or biological samples. As a result, lab plastic waste is not currently accepted by most recyclers. Instead, the waste must either be incinerated or decontaminated by autoclaving before being sent to landfill. Even if these items could be recycled, the recycled plastic is often more expensive and has inferior properties compared to virgin plastic – this isn’t to say that plastic shouldn’t be recycled where possible (e.g. uncontaminated packaging).

What can we do about the plastic problem?

In short, reduce and reuse. Going “cold turkey” from plastic products in the lab is perhaps inadvisable from a scientific as well as a health and safety perspective. However, avoiding the use of unnecessary single-use plastic consumables is often perfectly achievable and can save money. In some cases, this could be through good experimental planning, in other cases more significant operational and behavioural changes may be required.2 The type and location of lab will also determine the plastic-reducing practices possible. Sometimes a creative approach is needed.3

So, what is Peak Proteins doing about it?

At Peak Proteins (Part of Sygnature Discovery) we are always on the lookout for new ways to reduce plastic our waste without comprising the high quality of our work. Some of the plastic-reducing measures we have recently implemented are summarised below.

  • Changing to a pipette tip refill system with less plastic packaging in the Protein Science lab.

    The new pipette tip refill system has smaller plastic inserts and comes packaged in a cardboard box. We have estimated that this will save 27.5 kg of plastic and 85 kg of CO2 equivalents per year, corresponding to a carbon footprint reduction of 40% from pipette tips (calculations are based on those published in the literature). 2,4

  • Introducing weighing paper as an alternative to single-use plastic weighing boats.

    Instead, plastic weighing boats can be reused if preparing similar buffers or stocks. We have found that boats are more convenient for weighing larger quantities, but paper is better for weighing smaller amounts due to less static.

  • Purchasing bulk-packaged stripettes for non-sterile work.

    This reduces plastic waste from the packaging of individual stripettes. Often, the use of stripettes can be avoided altogether by using measuring cylinders which can be washed and reused.

  • Using appropriately sized collection tubes for the fraction volume being collected.

    Using tubes excessively larger than the fraction volume being collected generates needless plastic waste. For example, if a 12 mL tube weighing 5 g was used to collect a 2 mL fraction, instead of a 4 mL tube weighing 1.5 g, 175 g of excess plastic waste would be generated per 50 tubes. Similarly, a flask or a beaker could be used to collect large volumes, such as flowthrough. Tube usage can also be reduced when using an FPLC system by using the peak fractionation setting to automatically collect samples when an increase in A280 is detected.

References

1. Urbina M. A. et al. Environment: Labs should cut plastic waste too. Nature 528, 479 (2015).
2. Alves J. et al. A case report: insights into reducing plastic waste in a microbiology laboratory. Access Microbiology 3, 000173 (2021).
3. Kilcoyne J. et al. Reducing environmental impacts of marine biotoxin monitoring: A laboratory report. PLoS Sustainability and Transformation 1, 3, e0000001 (2022).
4. Farley M. and Nicolet B. P. Re-use of laboratory utensils reduces CO2 equivalent footprint and running costs PLoS ONE 18, 4, e0283697 (2023).

Go to Top